Skip to main content

Legal Procedure of Khula in Pakistan


Right of Khula Procedure in Pakistan:

For allowing wife, authority to exercise the right of Khula in Pakistan there must exists reasonable proof sufficient for the satisfaction of judge (Court) showing incompatibility of temperament including total lack of sympathy between husband and wife resulting in resistance to mutual adoption in case of khula in Pakistan. Intense hatred, serious discord, extreme disliking, strong malice explicitly indicating impossibility of future harmonious relationship between the parties in accordance with limits prescribed by God must exist.
Exercise of right of Khula in Pakistan is subject to restoration of partial or total benefits received by the wife in connection with marriage. Plea of previous divorce in Pakistan taken by husband was not accepted. Plea of previous divorce in Pakistan taken by husband in written statement in proceedings initiated by wife for maintenance was not upheld. It cannot at all be treated as pronouncement of divorce in Pakistan by husband to wife on date of filing of written statement in Court, followed by delivery of copy thereof to wife. Neither marriage between parties stands dissolved on date of filing of written statement. Nor does liability of husband to pay maintenance comes to an end on that day.



Procedure for Khula under the Law of Pakistan:

In the instant case the Muslim wife filed an application for maintenance under S. 125 for herself and her children. The husband filed a written statement on 05-12-1990 wherein he made certain generalized accusations against the wife and stated that ever since the marriage he found his wife to be sharp, shrewd and mischievous, accused the wife of having brought disgrace to the family, the husband stated that the answering respondent, feeling fade up with all such activities unbecoming of the wife-petitioner, has divorced her on 11-07-1987". The particulars of the alleged divorce in Pakistan were neither pleaded no circumstances under which and the persons, if any, in whose presence divorce was pronounced have been stated. Such deficiency continued to prevail even during the trial and the husband, except examining himself, adduced no evidence in proof of Divorce said to have been given by him on 11-07-1987.

Women’s Right for Khula in Pakistan:

There are no reasons substantiated in justification of Divorce and no plea or proof that any effort at reconciliation preceded the Divorce. Held, the Divorce to be effective has to be pronounced. The term “pronounce” means to proclaim, to utter formally, to utter rhetorically, to declare to, and utter to articulate. There is no proof of Divorce having taken place on 11-07-1987. A mere plea taken in the written statement of a divorce having been pronounced sometime in the past cannot by itself be treated as effectuating divorce on the date of delivery of the copy of the written statement to the wife. The husband out to have adduced evidence and proved the pronouncement of Divorce on 11-07-1987 and if he failed in proving the plea rose in the written statement, the plea ought to have been treated as failed. A plea of previous divorce taken in the written statement cannot at all be treated as pronouncement of divorce by the husband to wife on the date of filing of the written statement in the Court followed by delivery of a copy thereof to the wife. So also the affidavit, filed in some previous judicial proceedings not inter parte containing a self-serving statement of husband, Could not have been read in evidence as relevant and of any value. Thus neither the marriage between the parties stands dissolved on 05-12-1990 nor does the liability of the husband to pay maintenance comes to an end on the day.



What’s the rule for Husband after her Wife takes Khula:

Husband shall continue to remain liable for payment of maintenance until the obligation comes to an end in accordance with law. Wife who has cultivated hatred and aversion against her husband as a result of her maltreatment by her husband would be entitled to dissolution of marriage on ground of Khula. Order of Family Court dissolving marriage on ground of Khula in Pakistan and dismissing husband's suit for restitution of conjugal rights upheld by High Court by dismissing writ petition filed by husband to challenge Khula decree in view of such facts and unhappy relations between the couple, there existed genuine cause for their separation on the basis of Khula'. Dissolution of marriage on the basis of Khula in Pakistan was granted

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Know Fundamental Right & Advocate in Lahore Pakistan Under Law

Fundamental Right & Advocate in Lahore Pakistan: According to a family lawyer Nazia who is an advocate in Lahore Pakistan the popular forces struggling against the situation become necessarily focused on the immediate issue of restoration of political rights while the problems that mostly require systemic corrections, as of equality and non-discrimination in respect of women, although vital, get relegated to the background. The cause of women, thus, has a direct and manifold link with constitutional and democratic governance through an advocate in Lahore Pakistan . The Commission thinks it important, therefore, that any inquiry into the elemental problems of women begin by taking a close look at the country's Constitution. For its own part, the Commission considered it to have been assigned a more limited role. It has therefore passed over many of the sensitive manifestations of discrimination, though it has left no doubt about where it stands on principles. One area of s

Seek Advise About For Criminal Lawyer in Lahore Pakistan & Habes By Advocate Nazia

Criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan & Habeas: Advocate Nazia an expert criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan deals in habeas cases. Habeas corpus petition: Arrest and detention of defaulter. Where detent had alternative remedy before Revenue Officer under S. 82(8) of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1937 but he failed to avail the same habeas corpus petition through a criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan constitutional petition was not maintainable. Habeas corpus petition. Manager Agricultural Development Bank had taken the detenue in custody for nonpayment of the balance loan amount taken by him for Purchasing tractor trolley and fertilizers. Twenty-five acres of land belonging to the son of detenu was mortgaged with the said bank remedy under the relevant laws was available to the bank who instead of resorting to such remedy in the first instance straightaway jumped at the decision of putting the debtor behind the prison pressurizing him to pay the amount which step should have been t