Criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan & Habeas:
Advocate Nazia an expert criminal
lawyer in Lahore Pakistan deals in habeas cases. Habeas corpus petition: Arrest
and detention of defaulter. Where detent had alternative remedy before Revenue
Officer under S. 82(8) of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1937 but he failed to
avail the same habeas corpus petition through a criminal lawyer in
Lahore Pakistan constitutional petition was not maintainable. Habeas corpus
petition. Manager Agricultural Development Bank had taken the detenue in
custody for nonpayment of the balance loan amount taken by him for Purchasing
tractor trolley and fertilizers. Twenty-five acres of land belonging to the son
of detenu was mortgaged with the said bank remedy under the relevant laws was
available to the bank who instead of resorting to such remedy in the first
instance straightaway jumped at the decision of putting the debtor behind the
prison pressurizing him to pay the amount which step should have been taken in
the last resort.
Get Criminal Lawyer in Lahore For Success in
Your Case:
Detent at present was not in a position to bank argued by a criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan. Curtailing freedom and liberty of the detent in the presence of other available remedies was declared to be illegal and he was set at liberty accordingly [2000 YLR 26611. Defaulter to the agricultural income taxes no proceedings for habeas corpus petition.
Naib Tehsildar
respondent could not produce any record against the detent showing him to be
the recovery of said tax had been initiated against the owners of the land. All
citizens were equal in the eyes of law and were entitled to be treated equally.
No person other than the owner of the land was liable to pay agricultural
income tax in his lifetime. Detenu who was the tenant on the land could not be
liable to pay the said tax in default of his landlord. Arrest and detention of
the detent by the Naib Tehsildar was consequently declared to be illegal and
without lawful authority and he was set at liberty accordingly, [2000 PCr.LJ
171.
Detention of Defaulter Loaner:
Habeas Petitioner loaner was arrested for 10
days but after the expiry of said period, instead of releasing him he was sent
to central jail by order of Collector for 30 days before sending was recorded
nor he was given chance to be heard or to produce surety claimed by a criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan. The petitioner was never produced before the
collector who passed the order of arrest mechanically. Liberty of a person was
the most valuable right guaranteed by the Constitution which was to be
jealously guarded. Authorities had violated the provisions of law as envisaged
bony S. 81 of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 and the warrants issued under
S, 82(5) of the said act had been issued mechanically only to hoodwink the law
order sending the petitioner to the jail for 30 days passed by the collector in
the exercise of his powers •under S. 82(5) of was Pakistan Land Revenue Act.
1967 was set aside by the High Court with direction to release him forthwith.
[PLD Lah 5431’ Tentative finding on-point relating to service of notice on
detenu detained for recovery repayment of loans of the cooperative bank would
not bind special tribunal under relevant law becoming seized with recovery
repayment of loans. INLR 1989 SCJ 1051
Comments
Post a Comment