Skip to main content

Easily Get Dissolution of Marriage With Expert Lawyer


Suit for Dissolution of Marriage in Pakistan:

Suit for dissolution of marriage in Pakistan on the basis of Khula, recovery of dowry articles, maintenance, gold ornaments and dower amounting to Rs.50, 000 was filed by wife in court. Petitioner instead of filing appeal against the impugned judgment and decree passed by Judge Family Court before Appellate Court had directly challenged the same in Constitutional petition before High Court. Petitioner had remedy under the law to file appeal against the impugned judgment and decree passed by Judge Family Court before District Judge in case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan but instead of availing his remedy, before the proper forum, he had directly challenged the same before High Court through Constitutional petition. Petitioner had not asserted to the legal course. High Court dismissed Constitutional petition being not maintainable.  There is bar on appeal against interim order in case of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan. Section 14(3) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 barred appeal against an interim order passed by a Family Court.  Bar on appeal from decree of Family Court.

About Rate of Maintenance:

Appellate Court enhanced rate of maintenance upon trial Court decreed the suit by appeal filed by plaintiff. Defendant contended that judgment of the Appellate Court was result of wrongful exercise of jurisdiction as S. 14(2) (c) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 barred appeal from a decree passed by a Family Court awarding maintenance of Rs.1000 or less per month. Barring clause of S. 14 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 operated where decree of maintenance was challenged to disentitle the decree-holder or reduce the rate of maintenance the allowance and the same was not applicable to appeals for enhancement of maintenance.



Father was Legally Bound to maintain his Children:

Defendant's objection to maintainability of appeal was, therefore, misconceived. Strong financial position of defendant had been proved by his gifts to his second wife. Even otherwise, father was legally bound to maintain his children. Appellate Court rightly enhanced the rate of maintenance. Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly.  7. No appeal or revision was competent against interlocutory order. No appeal or revision was competent against interlocutory order of Family Court under S. 14(3) of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 in dissolution of marriage in Pakistan. A decree was passed for dissolution of marriage the husband's suit for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed simultaneously.

More about Dissolution of Marriage:

No appeal being competent from decree of dissolution of marriage in Pakistan. This decree becomes conclusive. It was held that District Judge was justified in refusing to proceed with husband's appeal against dismissal of his suit for restitution of conjugal rights. Dissolution of marriage. Appeal filed by wife. Dismissed earlier in default as neither appellant wife nor her counsel appeared on date of hearing of appeal was valid. Appeal filed by wife against judgment and decree of trial Court according to which suit for dissolution of marriage filed by wife against her husband was dismissed earlier in default as neither appellant wife nor her counsel appeared on date of hearing of appeal. Appeal was re-admitted subsequently and re-heard upon application of wife subject to payment of cost and husband agreed to re-admission of appeal and accepted cost. Earlier order dismissing appeal having been passed in absence of wife, re-hearing of appeal of wife, would not amount to review of earlier decision. Husband, who himself had agreed to re-hearing and having received cost, was stopped from re-agitating the matter of re-admission and re-hearing of appeal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Know Fundamental Right & Advocate in Lahore Pakistan Under Law

Fundamental Right & Advocate in Lahore Pakistan: According to a family lawyer Nazia who is an advocate in Lahore Pakistan the popular forces struggling against the situation become necessarily focused on the immediate issue of restoration of political rights while the problems that mostly require systemic corrections, as of equality and non-discrimination in respect of women, although vital, get relegated to the background. The cause of women, thus, has a direct and manifold link with constitutional and democratic governance through an advocate in Lahore Pakistan . The Commission thinks it important, therefore, that any inquiry into the elemental problems of women begin by taking a close look at the country's Constitution. For its own part, the Commission considered it to have been assigned a more limited role. It has therefore passed over many of the sensitive manifestations of discrimination, though it has left no doubt about where it stands on principles. One area of s...

Seek Advise About For Criminal Lawyer in Lahore Pakistan & Habes By Advocate Nazia

Criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan & Habeas: Advocate Nazia an expert criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan deals in habeas cases. Habeas corpus petition: Arrest and detention of defaulter. Where detent had alternative remedy before Revenue Officer under S. 82(8) of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1937 but he failed to avail the same habeas corpus petition through a criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan constitutional petition was not maintainable. Habeas corpus petition. Manager Agricultural Development Bank had taken the detenue in custody for nonpayment of the balance loan amount taken by him for Purchasing tractor trolley and fertilizers. Twenty-five acres of land belonging to the son of detenu was mortgaged with the said bank remedy under the relevant laws was available to the bank who instead of resorting to such remedy in the first instance straightaway jumped at the decision of putting the debtor behind the prison pressurizing him to pay the amount which step should have been t...

Legal Procedure of Khula in Pakistan

Right of Khula Procedure in Pakistan: For allowing wife, authority to exercise the right of Khula in Pakistan there must exists reasonable proof sufficient for the satisfaction of judge (Court) showing incompatibility of temperament including total lack of sympathy between husband and wife resulting in resistance to mutual adoption in case of khula in Pakistan. Intense hatred, serious discord, extreme disliking, strong malice explicitly indicating impossibility of future harmonious relationship between the parties in accordance with limits prescribed by God must exist. Exercise of right of Khula in Pakistan is subject to restoration of partial or total benefits received by the wife in connection with marriage. Plea of previous divorce in Pakistan taken by husband was not accepted. Plea of previous divorce in Pakistan taken by husband in written statement in proceedings initiated by wife for maintenance was not upheld. It cannot at all be treated as pronouncement of divorce in Pa...