Skip to main content

Suit of Declaration in Pakistan for Permanent Injunction to Legal Liers


Bar to Suit for Declaration in Pakistan:

Chairman of Arbitration Council has no power to issue certificate either rejecting divorce or holding the same to be ineffective. Family Court being possessed of exclusive jurisdiction to determine validity of marriage and suit for declaration in Pakistan and permanent injunction cannot be filed in civil court. Determination of dispute relating to false marriage lies. Determination of dispute relating to false marriage lies within jurisdiction of Family Court. Section 23 would be no bar to suit for declaration in Pakistan and possession before Family Court. Judge Family Court was competent to examine whether marriage certificate was executed under duress and coercion. Finding of fact by two Courts is based on evidence adduced by both parties. There is no misreading or non-reading of evidence warranting interference in exercise of Constitutional jurisdiction, Petition dismissed.

Suit for Declaration in Pakistan and Permanent injunction:

Term “Suit for declaration in Pakistan” and “Permanent injunction” not to be confined to civil cases. Suit for declaration in Pakistan along with permanent injunction regard less of its timings can be filed by person other than spouses involved in cancellation of marriage. Suit for declaration in Pakistan can also be filed by spouses against third party with a view to prevent them from denying their marriage. Nature of suit for declaration in Pakistan of marriage is of summary nature. Its main object is to perpetually silence a false allegation or claim put forward by defendant, of a marriage having taken place between defendant and plaintiff. It may include a suit for declaration in Pakistan by a person falsely posing to be spouse of defendant. It can be filed before Family Court even by a person other than spouses involved in cancellation of marriage.

Suit for Declaration in Pakistan of Marriage:

Character of suit for declaration in Pakistan of marriage is not altered by making additional prayer for adjudging marriage certificate as forged and seeking its cancellation. Held there was an air of utter reality in contention for husband/petitioner that suit, as framed and filed by wife/respondent, could not be said to be a suit for declaration in Pakistan of marriage and relief sought could only be granted by competent Civil Court and not by a Family Court. Suit for specific performance of agreement between spouses was valid. Earlier suit for declaration in Pakistan filed by petitioner for custody of children had been dismissed by Family Court and attained finality up till the Supreme Court. Second suit instituted by petitioner to determine right of visitation based on an agreement between spouses fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court. Petitioner had not agitated right of visitation in the earlier suit but it was deemed to have been directly and substantially in issue in the earlier Suit.

What is the Principle for Res Judicata?

Principle of res judicata applied in the case and Court seized with second suit could not try the same in view of Section 11, C.P.C. Second suit was also not maintainable in view of Section 21 of Specific Relief Act, 1877 as it was based on an agreement which contained a promise by respondent to arrange meeting of petitioner with minors till an indefinite period. Both Courts below having rightly dismissed the suit and appeal, revision was dismissed with Costs. Principle of res judicata with regard to plea of Khula' is not applicable in case of dissolution of marriage. Wife gets fresh cause of action to approach Family Court in view of fresh circumstances and subsequent events which may take place between the parties after withdrawal of previous suit. Bar on appeal from decree of Family Court. Barring clause of S. 14 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 operated where decree of maintenance was challenged to disentitle the decree-holder or reduce the rate of maintenance allowance and the same was not applicable to appeals for enhancement of maintenance.


For more information:


http://www.24article.com/legal-way-for-succession-certificate-in-pakistan.htmlhttps://www.ko-fi.com/Blog/Post/How-to-Solve-Suit-of-Declaration-in-Pakistan-C0C71E42N
https://runkit.com/ammywilson98/how-to-get-certificate-for-suit-of-declaration-in-pakistan
https://professionallawyers11.blogspot.com/2020/01/get-legal-certificate-for-suit-of.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Know Fundamental Right & Advocate in Lahore Pakistan Under Law

Fundamental Right & Advocate in Lahore Pakistan: According to a family lawyer Nazia who is an advocate in Lahore Pakistan the popular forces struggling against the situation become necessarily focused on the immediate issue of restoration of political rights while the problems that mostly require systemic corrections, as of equality and non-discrimination in respect of women, although vital, get relegated to the background. The cause of women, thus, has a direct and manifold link with constitutional and democratic governance through an advocate in Lahore Pakistan . The Commission thinks it important, therefore, that any inquiry into the elemental problems of women begin by taking a close look at the country's Constitution. For its own part, the Commission considered it to have been assigned a more limited role. It has therefore passed over many of the sensitive manifestations of discrimination, though it has left no doubt about where it stands on principles. One area of s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Seek Advise About For Criminal Lawyer in Lahore Pakistan & Habes By Advocate Nazia

Criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan & Habeas: Advocate Nazia an expert criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan deals in habeas cases. Habeas corpus petition: Arrest and detention of defaulter. Where detent had alternative remedy before Revenue Officer under S. 82(8) of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1937 but he failed to avail the same habeas corpus petition through a criminal lawyer in Lahore Pakistan constitutional petition was not maintainable. Habeas corpus petition. Manager Agricultural Development Bank had taken the detenue in custody for nonpayment of the balance loan amount taken by him for Purchasing tractor trolley and fertilizers. Twenty-five acres of land belonging to the son of detenu was mortgaged with the said bank remedy under the relevant laws was available to the bank who instead of resorting to such remedy in the first instance straightaway jumped at the decision of putting the debtor behind the prison pressurizing him to pay the amount which step should have been t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Legal Procedure of Khula in Pakistan

Right of Khula Procedure in Pakistan: For allowing wife, authority to exercise the right of Khula in Pakistan there must exists reasonable proof sufficient for the satisfaction of judge (Court) showing incompatibility of temperament including total lack of sympathy between husband and wife resulting in resistance to mutual adoption in case of khula in Pakistan. Intense hatred, serious discord, extreme disliking, strong malice explicitly indicating impossibility of future harmonious relationship between the parties in accordance with limits prescribed by God must exist. Exercise of right of Khula in Pakistan is subject to restoration of partial or total benefits received by the wife in connection with marriage. Plea of previous divorce in Pakistan taken by husband was not accepted. Plea of previous divorce in Pakistan taken by husband in written statement in proceedings initiated by wife for maintenance was not upheld. It cannot at all be treated as pronouncement of divorce in Pa...
Post a Comment
Read more